楼主: tony_mxl
1186 2

Credit Suisse:China-Leverage and De-leveraging [推广有奖]

学科带头人

14%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
6193 个
通用积分
243.1946
学术水平
5 点
热心指数
6 点
信用等级
3 点
经验
119995 点
帖子
612
精华
0
在线时间
2707 小时
注册时间
2010-6-26
最后登录
2023-5-15

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
3月20号,瑞信谈了中国的杠杆率与去杠杆,值得一读,21页:

High and rising leverage has been a well-known problem for the Chinese economy in the past six to seven years. We believe the sudden attention it gets from the Chinese government is due to the emergence of a new phenomenon – rising leverage of the financial sector. With a very stable short-term interbank repo market, non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) in China leveraged up aggressively to buy longer maturity bonds. As a result, the interbank lending (rolling 12 month total) rose from around 100% of GDP to the peak of 350% in last November before government tightening to raise the short-term repo rate as well as creating more volatility. The rise in short-term bond repo rate after the tightening will drive up the effectively lending and deposit rate in China, but not likely to have too much influence on overall credit growth.

In past few years, borrowing from households (mainly mortgage), government (both formal government bond as well as LGFV debt for infrastructure projects) and property companies were growing fastest, particularly after 2014. In contrast, the growth of industrial sector borrowing was rather slow. The current focus of debt-to-equity swap of industrial SOEs by the government, despite a good move, may not be able to solve a large part of the problem.

At some point, the government will have to force two policy dilemmas related to de-leveraging: 1) without a vibrant property market, it is difficult to reduce the property sector leverage; and 2) if infrastructure investment is slowed down to reduce borrowing for the purpose of de-leveraging, it will hurt economic growth. In 2017, we don’t expect credit growth to slow down much, but there will be more corporate loans (infrastructure) and less household loans (mortgage) given the current policy preference. Post 2018, this will be issues need to be addressed by the new administration.

In the long run, if the government wants to keep growth around current level, credit growth will have to keep at around 14%, and it is difficult to bring down the country’s leverage with credit growth at this pace. In contrast, if credit growth slows to 7%, nominal GDP growth may fall to as slow as 2% based on historical relationship.

The chance for a domestic financial crisis is low in China given the high savings ratio of the domestic economy and the government’s effective ownership of all key financial institutions. However, with the leverage of the economy becomes much higher, effectiveness of credit expansion to boost economic growth is reducing. For example, in 2009 only 19% of new credit was used for interest payment, but this ratio surged to 51% in 2014 before dropping to 35% in 2016, due to lowering interest rate environment and expensive LGFV loans shifted to lower cost government bonds. However, if interest rate rise again, it is entirely possible for this ratio to rise above the previous peak.



20170320-Credit Suisse-China:Leverage and De-leveraging.pdf (1.04 MB, 需要: 5 个论坛币)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Leverage Suisse Credit Lever Aging government attention believe Chinese problem

已有 1 人评分经验 收起 理由
xujingtang + 60 奖励积极上传好的资料

总评分: 经验 + 60   查看全部评分

本帖被以下文库推荐

沙发
西门高 发表于 2017-4-1 12:43:33 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢分享

使用道具

藤椅
xujingtang 发表于 2017-4-4 19:24:22 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-26 21:26