发帖
雷达卡
- Should monetary policy target more than just price stability?
- Should current policy decision rules be reconsidered?
- What are the challenges for central bank independence under a potentially expanded mandate?
Objectives (货币政策的目标)
Long-term price stability has been a primary objective of monetary policy for many years, and our review found no good reason why this should change. Low and stable inflation makes it easier for households and businesses to plan, and allows the economy to operate efficiently. But the crisis has shown that this is not enough: dangerous financial imbalances can brew under the apparently tranquil surface of low and stable inflation. And traditional prudential policy, which focused primarily on the stability of individual banks, proved inadequate to deal with the type of system-wide risks that led to the crisis.
So macroeconomic policy needs to pay greater attention to financial stability. However, the interest rate will often be a blunt and costly instrument to deal with financial imbalances. Would you put two million people out of work because banks are too leveraged or house prices are rising too fast? Instead, the first line of defense should be instruments that can target financial stability more directly and efficiently, including macroprudential tools, such as loan-to-value and debt-to-income limits, and capital flow management measures. Yet, when these tools prove insufficient, we may have to accept a new tradeoff for monetary policy, and the interest rate may have to lend a hand to maintain financial stability.
Policy decision rules （政策决定法则）
During the crisis, there were tectonic shifts in the structure and regulation of the financial sector. These have affected the impact of monetary policy on the broader economy. Moreover, the short-run relationship between inflation and unemployment seems to have changed.
The bottom line is that the details of how the central bank can best achieve its objectives are probably not the same as before the crisis. We still have a lot to learn about how things have changed and by how much, but it is already clear that for some time to come, monetary policy will involve more art and less science. This in itself will pose new challenges, including from a political economy standpoint. A less mechanical and predictable monetary policy may be more exposed to political interference, as we explain below.
Central bank independence （央行独立性）
Central bank independence has been helpful to maintain price stability. Ulysses had himself tied to the mast to resist the sirens, and governments tie their monetary policy to an independent central bank to resist the short-term temptation to inflate away fiscal constraints. A simple and measurable mandate allows for effective accountability and makes independence politically feasible.
But is it possible to extend independence to also cover financial stability? And critically, can central banks retain independence for price stability if they allow greater government oversight over financial stability?
The answer to the first question is not clear. Financial stability is far more difficult to measure than inflation, and policy actions would often have clearer winners and losers than interest rate policy. This complicates accountability and could bring political challenges. As for the second question, countries have chosen a wide range of institutional arrangements to deal with the challenge. In some countries, the central bank leads financial stability policies (Singapore, United Kingdom); elsewhere, the ministry of finance is ultimately in charge (United States). So far, there are no final answers on what works best.
MP in the New Normal.pdf
(1.61 MB, 需要: 2 个论坛币)
我发过的其他帖子：
IMF 世界经济展望 - 2014.1
IMF 世界经济展望 - 2014.4
IMF: 新常态下的货币政策 (Monetary Policy in the New Normal)
IMF 欧元区：通货紧缩or低通胀？
IMF: 财政监测报告（英文版100页） 2014Q1
IMF: 全球金融稳定报告（英文版184页） 2014Q1
瑞信: 页岩革命（The Shale Revolution I & II，英文版，共343页）
瑞信 全球经济季刊 2014.3 - Speeding up to Average
Credit Suisse (瑞信) 中国宏观策略 - 2014.3
京公网安备 11010802022788号
