楼主: bigfoot0517
1330 0

[外行报告] 瑞士信贷--美国石油天然气开采行业研究报告2007年7月 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 21粉丝

学术权威

21%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
6
论坛币
12493617 个
通用积分
2.6112
学术水平
391 点
热心指数
369 点
信用等级
405 点
经验
28609 点
帖子
2147
精华
2
在线时间
242 小时
注册时间
2006-11-15
最后登录
2019-1-31

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

Initiating Coverage on the E&P
MLPs at Market Weight
INITIATION
Rapid Growth, but for Whom?

We are launching coverage on the E&P Master Limited Partnerships
with a Market Weight position. We believe that the E&P MLPs are poised
to experience rapid asset growth in the coming years through consolidation of
mature domestic properties. However, much of that growth appears to be
reflected in current valuations. We are also concerned that the many new
MLPs scheduled to come onto the market will create heightened competition
for suitable long-life mature assets, thus driving up transaction prices and
reducing the currently available accretion benefits. We are initiating coverage
on three of the six existing E&P MLP companies: EV Energy Partners L.P.
(EVEP) with an Outperform rating and $44 per unit price target; and BreitBurn
Energy Partners L.P. (BBEP) with a $36 per unit target and Linn Energy LLC
(LINE) with a $34 per unit target, both with Neutral ratings.

E&P MLP segment set for rapid growth. The six E&P MLPs have a total
market cap of $9.2 billion and 73.4 mboe/d of production (0.5% of U.S. total).
We believe that the value of assets suitable for E&P MLPs (low decline rate,
long life) could represent some 25% of domestic production, implying a
theoretical sector market value in excess of $200 billion.

How much will growth will the existing MLPs capture? Current
valuations of the E&P MLPs assume a large amount of acquisitions.
However, we believe that a large amount of MLP-ready assets are already
controlled by traditional E&Ps, which will have a strong incentive to form
their own MLPs. Those new MLPs will need to grow through acquisitions,
thus rapidly increasing the competition for third-party acquisitions and
lowering accretion opportunities for existing MLPs, especially those that do
not have a parent that can drop down assets.

E&P MLPs are paying reasonable prices for assets, for now. We believe
that the prices that E&P MLPs have paid for assets to date (18 for $5.0 billion)
have been in-line with other North American E&P acquisitions. The E&P MLPs
have paid on average $11.80/boe of reserves and $76,900/flowing barrel basis
versus traditional E&Ps at $18/boe and $70,850/flowing barrel equivalent.
However, as competition heats up longer term, we believe that E&P MLPs
will tend to overpay for assets, which will eventually lead to their demise.

E&P MLPs will force a revaluation of proved reserves. We argue that
proved reserves have been undervalued by the marketplace for all E&Ps.
Geologic risk and near-term price risk have been stripped out of the proved
stream in an E&P MLP, leaving investors with essentially a high-yield bond
that should trade at a spread to the ten-year Treasury.

Table of Contents
Investment Summary 4
Initiating Coverage of the E&P MLPs with a Market Weight Position 6
Existing MLPs Overview 6
Operating Areas 7
Small Market Footprint Currently 8
Production 8
Reserves 9
Reserves to Production 10
E&P MLPs are Gas Weighted Today 10
Maintenance Capex 11
Hedging 11
Master Limited Partnerships Overview 13
History of MLPs 13
Incentive Distribution Rights of MLPs 15
Tax Advantages of MLPs? 18
Valuation of MLPs 21
E&P MLPs Have Assumed Acquisitions Built into Valuations 23
Valuation Is Greater than PV10 23
Can the E&P MLPs Grow As Expected? 24
Benefits of E&Ps Creating Their Own MLPs May Reduce Available Acquisitions 28
Implications for Traditional E&P Valuation 29
Stripping of Lower Risk Assets Increases E&P Risk 29
Reserves to Production Ratios Should Decline 32
Is PV10 Valuation Still Right for E&Ps? 32
Cash Flows Should Increase in Variance 33
Growth Should Accelerate 33
Impact on Hedging 33
Impact on Private Equity and the Current Model 34
Disadvantages of an MLP Structure 35
MLP-able E&P Assets 36
What Makes a Good Asset for an E&P MLP? 36
Are Oil or Gas Fields Preferred? 36
Investment Cycle 38
How Big Could the Space Get? 38
When Will the Party End? 38
Could a Canadian-Like Meltdown Occur in the U.S.? 38
Risks
EVEP 40
Summary 42
Partnership Overview 42
Investment Attractions 42
Investment Concerns 42
Valuation 43
Asset Overview 45
Structure 45
Management 46
Risks 46
BBEP 52
Summary 53
Partnership Overview 53
Investment Attractions 53
Investment Concerns 54
Valuation 55

Asset Overview 57
Structure 57
Management 58
Risks
LINE 65
Summary 66
Partnership Overview 66
Investment Attractions 66
Investment Concerns 67
Valuation 67
Asset Overview 69
Structure 69
Management 70
Risks 70

219330.pdf (1.05 MB, 需要: 5 个论坛币)


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:行业研究报告 石油天然气 天然气开采 研究报告 美国石油 美国 信贷 石油 瑞士 天然气开采

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-4 21:48