楼主: jiliangamelia
1770 5

about con trol variable [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

本科生

98%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
11 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
256 点
帖子
70
精华
0
在线时间
116 小时
注册时间
2009-9-27
最后登录
2016-6-2

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
i did ols...and there are 9 control variables in my ols model.
firstly i add control one by one and individually together with dependent and independent variable. and i found there are 3 control variables are siginificant.
but then i did ols with every variable together, then it showed that there are only one control variable is siginificant. but the independent variable is always significant with both ways like i explained as above.


so strange..which one is corret? and what i should deal with this? if the control variable is not siginificant then i should delete them out from my ols model?
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Variable About ABLE trol Bout Variable con trol

回帖推荐

Lord长空一剑 发表于2楼  查看完整内容

you may manipulate the variables if it's insignificant. you've mentioned that e variables are significant individually, but only one maintains its significance when all the variabled combined. hence, it is true that only one variable should be taken when you have concerned all the factors listed together in this model. however, you 'll have to argue why . you have to because the ...

本帖被以下文库推荐

you may manipulate the variables if it's insignificant.

you've mentioned that e variables are significant individually, but only one maintains its significance when all the variabled combined.

hence, it is true that only one variable should be taken when you have concerned all the factors listed together in this model.  

however, you 'll have to argue why .

  you have to because the two wre significant, but when they act with other factors , they are difersified away. so there must some interlinks between these variables.

you may first reason it using your economic sence,  because econometrics is economics on the earth, statistical model is only a tool. you have to interpret the economic meaning of it.

then , mathemetically and statistically , you can have a look at the correlation between each variables. you will find the reason from it.  if the correlations are negtive between some variables , then it is easy to explain why these two variables, which were initially significant in each individual models , are driven away from the whole model.
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 收起 理由
胖胖小龟宝 + 10 + 10 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 经验 + 10  论坛币 + 10   查看全部评分

使用道具

藤椅
jiliangamelia 发表于 2010-3-7 07:44:34 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Lord长空一剑 发表于 2010-3-7 07:41
you may manipulate the variables if it's insignificant.

you've mentioned that e variables are significant individually, but only one maintains its significance when all the variabled combined. then you 'll have to argue why .

  you have to because the two wre significant, but when they act with other factors , they are difersified away. so there must some interlinks between these variables.

you may first reason it using your economic sence,  because econometrics is economics on the earth, statistical model is only a tool. you have to interpret the economic meaning of it.

then , mathemetically and statistically , you can have a look at the correlation between each variables. you will find the reason from it.  if the correlations are negtive between some variables , then it is easy to explain why these to variables are driven away from the whole model.
wow..i did not expect it would be so quick like this..thank you for your kind answer!

使用道具

not at all,
actually I have just logged in today, and I saw it.
3# jiliangamelia

使用道具

I have done slightly a bit literal change in my answer , i did not expect you reply to my answer so soon, too.

使用道具

地板
jiliangamelia 发表于 2010-3-7 08:14:12 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Lord长空一剑 发表于 2010-3-7 07:41
you may manipulate the variables if it's insignificant.

you've mentioned that e variables are significant individually, but only one maintains its significance when all the variabled combined.

hence, it is true that only one variable should be taken when you have concerned all the factors listed together in this model.  

however, you 'll have to argue why .

  you have to because the two wre significant, but when they act with other factors , they are difersified away. so there must some interlinks between these variables.

you may first reason it using your economic sence,  because econometrics is economics on the earth, statistical model is only a tool. you have to interpret the economic meaning of it.

then , mathemetically and statistically , you can have a look at the correlation between each variables. you will find the reason from it.  if the correlations are negtive between some variables , then it is easy to explain why these two variables, which were initially significant in each individual models , are driven away from the whole model.
When i analyse the control variables individually, there are three significant ones.....DR ER FS. and then when i put them together, there is only one left. that is FS. and then i found DR and ER have collinearity....i used correlation matrix table to analyse collinearity.

I was wonderring, when variables have collinearity, i do not need to delete them..right? the book said sometimes after deleting, maybe new problems come up...so should i understand it as i can keep them and do nothing...or i should do something to deal with collinearity?

i have a question:
can i keep DR and ER? And for other control variables that are always insignificant, should i delete them or else?

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-14 02:12