楼主: zhongzhoufeng
3180 4

[文献讨论] 求教帕累托效率 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

闲人

硕士生

66%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0.0600
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
1 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
1256 点
帖子
108
精华
0
在线时间
209 小时
注册时间
2006-3-2
最后登录
2020-2-11

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
帕累托效率

[此贴子已经被河塘月色于2006-3-9 9:47:06编辑过]

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:帕累托 效率 求教 帕累托

想要杀人,缺少利器,想要救人,无人可救
只有别人杀我、自救
沙发
bajjio 发表于 2006-3-8 15:58:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Pareto Efficiency:

A concept due to the Italian economist and social theorist Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923)

A social state is said to be Pareto efficient when there is no feasible alternative to it in which at least one individual is better off and no individual is worse off. That is to say:

Given two possible states of affairs (e.g., distributions of resources) S1 and S2, S2 is Pareto efficient with respect to S1 (or “Pareto superior”) if no one prefers S1 to S2 and at least one person prefers S2 to S1.

  • When a competitive market reaches equilibrium, the outcome can be described as a Pareto optimum in that there are no Pareto efficient moves left: i.e., there are no remaining ways of redistributing holdings (or whatever else can be distributed) that would make someone better off without making someone else worse off. To put that another way: State S is Pareto optimal if there exists no State S1 that is Pareto superior to it.

  • One of the problems with utilitarianism, you will recall, was the problem of finding a common measure for interpersonal comparisons of utility. Pareto developed this sort of analysis to overcome such problems. We cannot make interpersonal comparisons of utility, says Pareto, but each person can judge for herself whether she is better off in S1 or S2. So, if everyone prefers S2 to S1, we have reason to believe that general social welfare must be greater in S2.


使用道具

藤椅
xinqulingling 发表于 2006-3-9 12:24:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

简言之就是:如果唯一增加某人福利的方法就是牺牲其他人的福利,那么这种状态下就是具有帕累托效率的,也就是我们西方经济学上一般所谓的“最有效的”。

使用道具

板凳
sungmoo 发表于 2006-3-10 09:40:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

这是周期帖了。可与下面并贴讨论。

https://bbs.pinggu.org/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=47&replyID=346582&id=55400&skin=0

https://bbs.pinggu.org/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=47&replyID=277467&id=45803&skin=0

https://bbs.pinggu.org/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=47&replyID=81778&id=13912&skin=0

不存在“强帕累托改善”(可能性)的状态是“强帕累托效率”状态。

但不存在“弱帕累托改善”(可能性)的状态不是“弱帕累托效率”状态(而是一种“更强的”帕累托效率状态)。所有资源只归一个人所有也是一种帕累托效率状态。

理解“帕累托效率”要从“帕累托改善”入手。不存在“越弱的”帕累托改善,则是“越强的”帕累托效率;反之,不存在“越强的”帕累托改善,则是“越弱的”帕累托效率。

使用道具

报纸
江畔夏草 在职认证  发表于 2013-3-18 17:40:59 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
在不损害他人效用的情况下,增加一部分人的福利

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-26 00:41