楼主: bigfoot0517
1025 2

[外行报告] 2010年3月欧洲制药行业研究报告 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 21粉丝

已卖:14110份资源

学术权威

21%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
6
论坛币
12493638 个
通用积分
3.1784
学术水平
391 点
热心指数
369 点
信用等级
405 点
经验
28609 点
帖子
2147
精华
2
在线时间
242 小时
注册时间
2006-11-15
最后登录
2019-1-31

楼主
bigfoot0517 发表于 2010-3-11 15:41:34 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
【出版时间及名称】:2010年3月欧洲制药行业研究报告
        【作者】:摩根大通
        【文件格式】:pdf
        【页数】:136
        【目录或简介】:
Table of Contents
Executive summary..................................................................3
Roche – Overweight PT SFr 237............................................12
Bayer – Overweight – Price Target
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:行业研究报告 制药行业 研究报告 行业研究 OVERWEIGHT 研究报告 行业 欧洲

j 欧洲制药 3.pdf
下载链接: https://bbs.pinggu.org/a-567781.html

2.96 MB

需要: 10000 个论坛币  [购买]

沙发
bigfoot0517(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2010-3-11 15:41:56
Returns on Pharma R&D have been disappointing: From 2000-2009,
US and European large cap companies have spent half a trillion dollars,
but 2010E sales of products launched since 2005 are just $4bn, or 6% of
2010E sales.
• The Remedy: Cutting in-house R&D and externalise it is unlikely to fix
the problem. The remedy, in our view, is increased appetite for risk, with
rigorous focus on unmet need that needs to be complemented by
aggressive licensing to diversify risk. Roche and Novartis have been early
movers on both dimensions.
• Pipeline assets are largely free: 100% of European pharma share prices
can be attributed to marketed products - not because pipelines are empty
but because investors attribute little value to late stage pipeline assets, as
innovative approaches are heavily discounted and in-licensed assets
remain under-analysed. Data from our investor survey supports this view.
Realistically, upside to share prices from cuts to R&D from here seems
limited, therefore investment focus should move on to upside from
better than expected R&D output.
• What if the market is wrong on R&D output? In this report we
highlight 9 un-appreciated mega-blockbuster candidates with data from
2011-2014 that fulfill 3 criteria: (1) address substantial unmet medical
need (2) could substantially impact company valuation and (3) not
reflected in forecasts and valuation. The NPV of those 9 blockbusters
exceeds $100bn, providing 25% upside to the market cap of European
pharma companies.
• Potential Winners: We calculate that Roche has 41% upside from 3
mega-blockbuster candidates (dalcetrapib, aleglitazar, RG1678). GSK has
16-25% upside from 3 high potential assets (darapladib, otelixizumab, next
generation COPD drugs). Aside from Novartis’ COPD programme (9%
upside), Novartis seems to rely more on the breadth of its portfolio, rather
than mega-blockbusters. Programs that made the cut in the midcap space
include Ipsen’s sulphatase inhibitor oristusane (37% upside), and Bayer’s
riociguat (22% upside).
• Therapeutic Focus: We provide an in depth analysis on the most
promising, underappreciated development activities in CV, respiratory,
auto-immune diseases, CNS and oncology.

藤椅
暹罗妹(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2010-3-16 10:40:37
P民就是P民

呵呵

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-9 11:43