麦哲学术：JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT（管理学杂志）2020年01月刊论文摘要汇编-经管之家官网！

Tackling Taboo Topics: A Review of the Three Ms inWorking Women’s Lives

作者：Alicia A. Grandey, Allison S. Gabriel, Eden B. King

在北美和西欧，妇女现在占劳动力的将近一半，但在薪酬和晋升方面仍然面临差距。我们建议女性在三位女士中的自然经历（即月经，产妇和更年期）成为禁忌话题，可能会限制女性的职业。我们建议这三位女士在相交的职业阶段（即月经不适的工作市场新人，职业早期哺乳，公司领导经常出现潮红）与期望格格不入，对工作成果有影响。在这篇综述中，我们通过回顾月经，产妇和更年期如何与（1）荷尔蒙和生理变化，（2）社会信仰和刻板印象以及（3）工作影响如何相关的证据来解决这三个女士的禁忌，认知和行为。最后，我们提出了将这三个女士纳入现有理论框架的新含义（即，非工作溢出，污名和披露，职业健康），并提出了新的研究问题和实践，以理解和解决妇女健康与职业轨迹的交叉方式。

In NorthAmerica and Western Europe, women now compose almost half the workforce butstill face disparities in pay and promotions. We suggest that women’s naturalexperiences of the three Ms (i.e., menstruation, maternity, and menopause) aretaboo topics in ways that may constrain women’s careers. We propose that thethree Ms are particularly incongruent with expectations at intersecting careerstages (i.e., a job market newcomer having menstrual discomfort, an earlycareer professional breastfeeding, a company leader getting hot flashes), withimplications for work outcomes. In this review, we tackle the taboo of thethree Ms by reviewing the evidence for how menstruation, maternity, andmenopause are each linked to (1) hormonal and physiological changes, (2)societal beliefs and stereotypes, and (3) work affect, cognition, and behavior.We conclude by proposing novel implications for incorporating the three Ms intoexisting theoretical frameworks (i.e., work-nonwork spillover; stigma anddisclosure; occupational health) and presenting new research questions andpractices for understanding and addressing the ways that women’s healthintersects with career trajectories.

Media Coverage of Firms: Background, Integration, andDirections for Future Research

作者：Lorenz Graf-Vlachy, Abbie Griffith Oliver, Richard Banfield, AndreasKönig, Jonathan Bundy

在过去的几年中，公司的媒体报道受到了学术界的广泛关注。但是，由此产生的文学散布于多个学科，因此，其理论基础和上下文环境也有所不同。这使学者们难以理解这些文献的贡献，确定研究领域并制定全面的研究议程。在这篇综述中，我们通过调查有关企业媒体报道的各种文献来解决这些问题，以建立媒体报道的前因和后果的综合框架，从而突出未来研究的路径。具体来说，我们确定了文献通常在新闻媒体上假设的三种理论视角（经济，制度和社会心理学）。此外，我们重点介绍了战略，财务，治理和危机环境之间的差异，并回顾了检查企业媒体报道的文章的结果。在每种情况下，我们都会确定新闻媒体的主要功能，以及媒体报道的前因和后果。我们将基于这些发现，并研究用于衡量媒体报道的经验方法，特别是有关特定报道属性的测量方法，从而为公司的媒体报道建立一个综合框架。我们强调了我们的框架所揭示的当前知识方面的差距，并为以后的研究提供了机会，从而可以进一步使学者和实践者对公司媒体报道有所了解。

Over thepast years, media coverage of firms has received significant scholarlyattention. However, the resulting literature is spread across multipledisciplines and, therefore, varies with regard to its theoretical underpinningsand contextual settings. This makes it challenging for scholars to understandthe contributions of this literature, to identify areas of inquiry, and todevelop an encompassing research agenda. In this review, we address theseissues by surveying the diverse literature on media coverage of firms todevelop an integrative framework of the antecedents and consequences of mediacoverage that highlights paths for future research. Specifically, we identifythe three theoretical perspectives—economic, institutional, andsocial-psychological—that the literature generally assumes on the news media.In addition, we highlight differences between strategy, finance, governance,and crisis contexts and review results from articles examining media coverageof firms in aggregate. In each context, we identify the primary functions ofthe news media as well as antecedents and consequences of media coverage. Weproceed to develop an integrative framework for media coverage of firms bybuilding on these findings and by examining the empirical methods used tomeasure media coverage, particularly regarding the measurement of specificcoverage attributes. We highlight the gaps in current knowledge that ourframework exposes and derive opportunities for future research that can furtherscholars’ and practitioners’ understanding of firm media coverage.

Bridging Methodological Divides Between Macro- andMicroresearch: Endogeneity and Methods for Panel Data

作者：Paul D. Bliese, Donald J. Schepker, Spenser M. Essman, Robert E.Ployhart

面向宏观和微观的研究人员都经常使用面板数据，在这些数据中，重复测量感兴趣的结果。面板数据至少支持五个不同的建模框架（在内部/之间，增量/紧急情况，跨级别和增长）。宏观和微观领域的研究人员倾向于使用不同的框架，并且在使用相同的建模框架时也使用不同的分析工具和术语。这些差异可能会抑制跨学科交流。在这篇综述中，我们探索宏观和微观研究者如何处理面板数据，并特别强调选择一个框架与另一个框架的理论含义。我们举例说明固定效应模型和随机效应模型之间的差异以及它们之间的相似性，我们对2017年在领先管理期刊中使用面板数据的142篇文章进行了全面回顾。 -和随机效应模型，将时间建模为有意义的预测指标，或确保控制未观察到的时间异质性，并使假设与分析选择保持一致。最后，我们的目标是帮助促进面向宏观和微观的管理研究人员之间的交流和理论发展。

Both macro-and micro-oriented researchers frequently use panel data where the outcome ofinterest is measured repeated times. Panel data support at least five differentmodeling frameworks (within, between, incremental/emergent, cross-level, andgrowth). Researchers from macro- and micro-oriented domains tend to differentiallyuse the frameworks and also use different analytic tools and terminology whenusing the same modeling framework. These differences have the potential toinhibit cross-discipline communication. In this review, we explore how macro-and microresearchers approach panel data with a specific emphasis on thetheoretical implications of choosing one framework versus another. Weillustrate how fixed-effects and random-effects models differ and how they aresimilar, and we conduct a thorough review of 142 articles that used panel datain leading management journals in 2017. Ultimately, our review identifies waysthat researchers can better employ fixed- and random-effects models, model timeas a meaningful predictor or ensure unobserved time heterogeneity is controlled,and align hypotheses to analytic choice. In the end, our goal is to helpfacilitate communication and theory development between macro- andmicro-oriented management researchers.

EPM 20/20: A Review, Framework, and Research Agendafor Electronic Performance Monitoring

作者：Daniel M. Ravid, David L. Tomczak, Jerod C. White, Tara S. Behrend

电子绩效监控（EPM）是指使用技术手段观察，记录和分析与工作绩效直接或间接相关的信息。关于EPM文献的最新综述是在2000年发表的。自2000年以来，信息技术的飞跃发展创造了一种环境，在这种环境中，组织能够比以前更广泛，更密集地监视员工。此外，自那时以来，大量研究致力于理解EPM对个人绩效和态度的影响。 EPM文献中存在矛盾的发现，这表明EPM是一种多维现象，与情境和心理变量有关。因此，我们提出了一种基于理论的EPM特性类型学，并将这种类型学用作审查EPM文献并确定未来研究和实践议程的框架。

Electronicperformance monitoring (EPM) refers to the use of technological means toobserve, record, and analyze information that directly or indirectly relates tojob performance. The last comprehensive review of the EPM literature waspublished in 2000. Since 2000, dramatic advances in information technologieshave created an environment in which organizations are able to monitor employeesto a greater extent and with greater intensity than was previously possible.Moreover, since that time, considerable research has been devoted tounderstanding the effects of EPM on individual performance and attitudes.Contradictory findings in the EPM literature exist, suggesting that EPM is amultidimensional phenomenon and one for which contextual and psychologicalvariables are pertinent. Thus, we propose a theory-based typology of EPMcharacteristics and use this typology as a framework to review the EPMliterature and identify an agenda for future research and practice.

Privacy at Work: A Review and a Research Agenda for aContested Terrain

作者：Devasheesh P. Bhave, Laurel H. Teo, Reeshad S. Dalal

工作场所的隐私是员工和雇主的关键问题。员工期望能够控制他们提供给组织的个人信息和访问。但是，雇主希望获得有关其雇员的广泛信息以及对雇员的广泛访问。这两个经常相互竞争的期望之间的鸿沟已被监管和技术趋势放大。我们通过整合来自多个学科的观点来展开对隐私的定义，并勾勒出信息隐私和工作环境隐私的隐私上下文，从而开始本次回顾。然后，我们确定工作场所隐私的主要利益相关者并描述他们的利益。这次讨论为我们的利益相关者的隐私演算模型提供了一个平台，该模型反过来提供了一个框架，在其中我们可以回顾组织研究和相关学科在工作场所隐私方面的实证研究结果，并从中发现现有研究的空白。然后，我们提出广泛的研究议程。最后，我们提请注意对员工和雇主具有深远影响的新兴技术和法律。我们的审查为研究人员和从业人员提供了一个路线图，以解决工作场所隐私争议的领域。

Privacy inthe workplace is a pivotal concern for employees and employers. Employeesexpect to be in control of the personal information and access they provide tothe organization. Employers, however, expect extensive information regardingtheir employees as well as extensive access to employees’ presence. The chasmbetween these two often competing expectations has been magnified by regulatoryand technological trends. We begin the review by integrating viewpoints frommultiple disciplines to disentangle definitions of privacy and to delineate theprivacy contexts of information privacy and work environment privacy. We thenidentify the key stakeholders of privacy in the workplace and describe theirinterests. This discussion serves as a platform for our stakeholders’ privacycalculus model, which in turn provides a framework within which we reviewempirical findings on workplace privacy from organizational research andrelated disciplines and from which we identify gaps in the existing research.We then advance an extensive research agenda. Finally, we draw attention toemerging technologies and laws that have far-reaching implications foremployees and employers. Our review provides a road map for researchers andpractitioners to navigate the contested terrain of workplace privacy.

Multiple Jobholding: An Integrative Systematic Reviewand Future Research Agenda

作者：Emily D. Campion, Brianna B. Caza, Sherry E. Moss

尽管对多种职业（MJH）的估计数量可观但变化很大，并且跨学科（例如管理，经济学，社会学，健康和医学）的研究已有数十年之久，但我们对MJH的理解却相当有限。这篇综述的目的是提供有关MJH或不止一项工作的文献的连贯综合。从讨论预测MJH的动机和人口统计预测因素开始，我们注意到预测MJH的研究与检查结果的研究之间存在明显的鸿沟，很少有研究探讨动机如何与MJH的经历和结果相关。该评价中的另一个重要观察结果是，各学科之间和学科内部关于MJH是耗竭还是富足的研究结果不一致。使用这个框架来组织我们的审查，我们试图通过提出关于MJH的机制和边界条件的研究来调和总体上混合的结果，以解释如何以及何时耗尽或丰富多名工作人员（MJHers）。通过整合文献中的发现，我们能够更清楚地阐明消耗和致富的途径，并讨论基于推动与拉动的动机来担任多个工作可能如何预测这些途径。最后，我们提供了一个战略议程，重点突出了急需进行更多研究的领域，以使学者们具备有关如何帮助MJHer管理其多个工作角色以及如何帮助组织管理MJHer的实践知识。

「经管之家」APP：经管人学习、答疑、交友，就上经管之家！
免流量费下载资料----在经管之家app可以下载论坛上的所有资源，并且不额外收取下载高峰期的论坛币。
涵盖所有经管领域的优秀内容----覆盖经济、管理、金融投资、计量统计、数据分析、国贸、财会等专业的学习宝库，各类资料应有尽有。
来自五湖四海的经管达人----已经有上千万的经管人来到这里，你可以找到任何学科方向、有共同话题的朋友。
经管之家（原人大经济论坛），跨越高校的围墙，带你走进经管知识的新世界。
扫描下方二维码下载并注册APP