楼主: elephann
7689 11

[有偿编程] 多个时间序列的描述性统计量,求助!! [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 7粉丝

巫师

已卖:1466份资源

学科带头人

19%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
15946 个
通用积分
57.8060
学术水平
54 点
热心指数
50 点
信用等级
30 点
经验
36783 点
帖子
1184
精华
0
在线时间
2178 小时
注册时间
2004-12-31
最后登录
2025-12-28

楼主
elephann 发表于 2011-8-20 04:18:36 |AI写论文
10论坛币
最近做个数据分析,有800个时间序列,现在有点迷糊,这个数据集的描述性统计量该怎么做?一个时间序列好办,但这么多,该咋做呢?有大家帮忙!!!另外,做出后能否做成个表,好转化为PDF或者其他图片格式?

关键词:描述性统计量 描述性统计 时间序列 描述性 统计量 图片 统计
独立精神,自由意志!

沙发
soccy 发表于 2011-8-20 06:19:38
mixed effect model

藤椅
Bayesian.var 发表于 2011-10-16 23:42:25
If you use R, then it's easy, try package"coda". Lets say you have a time series X(T,N), N=800 in your case,
then just write following code:

# 1. define as a mcmc object
mc.X=mcmc(X)

# 2. some descriptive summary statistics
summary(X)  # or partily of X, i.e., X[,1:5]

# 3. some density plot
plot(X)  # or partily of X, i.e., X[,1:5]

# 4. if you want to learn more about this package
help(package=coda)

Sorry for english, I only hv english type in my office computer, but I can see Chinese :)


已有 2 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
famousid + 1 + 1 + 1 热心帮助其他会员
yahoocom + 20 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 论坛币 + 20  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

I use to type English as my computer in office room doesn't support Chinese.

板凳
elephann 发表于 2011-10-19 02:01:34
Bayesian.var 发表于 2011-10-16 23:42
If you use R, then it's easy, try package"coda". Lets say you have a time series X(T,N), N=800 in yo ...
你好!我一直比较困惑的是对这么多时间序列最后的描述统计量的形式:如果按照每个时间序列,则描述的是单个时间序列的特征,如果按照某一横截面(某特定时间点或区间)则描述的又是横截面特征。现在,你给出的这个方法我也尝试了一下,但结果还是一个个时间序列的特征。我曾经设想:先将所有时间序列的统计量得出,再针对各个统计量再进行描述统计,比如,N个序列的均值,再描述均值:最大、最小、均值标准差等等,但未见任何人做过,所以困惑——但我觉得这样是对数据更好地描述! 哦,对了,你的第二个语句:summary(X)是不是应该是summary(mc.X),否则又回到了初始数据直接描述了! anyway,thanks!
独立精神,自由意志!

报纸
zjying2000 在职认证  发表于 2011-10-19 12:58:40
是呀,说得对

地板
Bayesian.var 发表于 2011-10-28 23:39:09
elephann 发表于 2011-10-18 19:01
你好!我一直比较困惑的是对这么多时间序列最后的描述统计量的形式:如果按照每个时间序列,则描述的是 ...
Hi,
Thanks for your correction, and I am sorry that that I was misunderstanding with your question before. But now my question arises, why do you need to give a kind of "descriptive" statistics about so many series at one time, and that should also makes the others so easily to understand, and assume that they don't need a formula or further inference to help understanding. For instance, if we have a series of 800 funds, I think it is really hard to give a such "descriptive" statistics that can pool information together based on all, or maybe it's not a good idea to pool them together just because we want to describe it shortly, or maybe you are refering to the stock index (Dow Jones) or the economic index, or dynamic factors..., if you create such an index as you metioned (Actually I am really looking forward to it :)), people may need instructions to understand your index, and to know how your index describes the series.
Anyway, it is a good question when we face such an "embrassment of riches". If I were you, I may try to think something that is "representative", like Top 5, top 10 series, then to say something "descriptive"; or even better, if I know how the series can be grouped or blocked, like I get the data from different sections of economy, or a block of parameters (L=(l1,l2,....)'), then I will pick up one or some out and describe with usual statistics.
            
I use to type English as my computer in office room doesn't support Chinese.

7
gaoxinsynge 发表于 2013-4-2 23:17:38
看看

8
daisong 发表于 2013-6-24 10:28:06

这算是纵向数据吗?

9
Ben910128 发表于 2013-6-24 17:57:35
kankan

10
ilomuc 发表于 2014-3-13 20:18:02
学习
成事不说,遂事不谏,既往不咎。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注cda
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-2 00:50