楼主: eros_zz
10994 207

[财经英语角区] 20110829 Follow Me 110   [推广有奖]

荣誉版主

查看头衔双击这里

泰斗

34%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

投资人

投资人价值发现

【投资人】深度研究

威望
15
论坛币
2187197 个
通用积分
44470.5359
学术水平
2363 点
热心指数
2621 点
信用等级
2249 点
经验
232963 点
帖子
4950
精华
112
在线时间
10125 小时
注册时间
2008-8-22
最后登录
2023-7-12

一级伯乐勋章 初级热心勋章 初级信用勋章 中级学术勋章 初级学术勋章 中级热心勋章 中级信用勋章 高级学术勋章 高级热心勋章 高级信用勋章 特级热心勋章 特级学术勋章 特级信用勋章

楼主
eros_zz 学生认证  发表于 2011-8-29 00:31:20 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群|倒序 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
A Simple, Cost-Free Remedy for the Hard-Core Unemployed: View

Some day the economic slump will be over, and then where will we be? The slowdown has hit Americans hard, but not equally hard. The unemployment rate is 8.1 percent for white Americans. For Hispanics, it’s considerably higher -- 11.3 percent. And it’s almost double for blacks -- 15.9 percent.


The economic gap between the races has widened, partly because their job prospects have diverged. A recent study by the Pew Research Center reveals that the median household worth for whites was 20 times that for blacks and 18 times that for Hispanics in 2009. The differentials were roughly twice what they had been since 1984, when Pew first started tracking this data. The Great Recession has produced a less egalitarian society.


The principal causes of higher joblessness among blacks and Hispanics are deep and inter-related: higher incarceration rates, lower education levels and, yes, discrimination. These problems don’t lend themselves to quick solutions or cheap ones. Yet they can be addressed, in part, with a specific remedy.

It’s a simple idea called Ban the Box.

The box at issue is the one on many if not most job applications that asks whether the candidate has a criminal record, meaning at least one arrest. A number of studies have shown that when the answer is yes, which is much more often the case with blacks and Hispanics than with whites, an applicant’s chances are greatly diminished.

Rap Sheets It’s not surprising that an employer who knows an applicant has a record would judge him or her largely on that fact rather than on the merits of the application. So the Ban-the-Box initiative reverses the order of things. The movement encourages employers to ask about rap sheets only when applicants are finalists, and then to consider how a criminal past may -- or may not -- actually affect an individual’s ability to do the job.

Starting with Boston in 2004, 24 U.S. cities, three counties and six states so far have banned the box in their hiring practices by adopting laws or resolutions or simply changing recruitment policies. Hawaii, Massachusetts and the city of Philadelphia have extended the box ban to private employers.


A number of these jurisdictions have also stipulated that those doing the hiring must apply the standards of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to disqualify candidates based on criminal records. Those policies encourage managers to consider the nature and gravity of the offense, how long ago it was committed and how it relates to the job sought. A bust for marijuana possession, for instance, probably wouldn’t affect the ability of a receptionist, clerk or janitor to do the job.

Fewer Rejections

After banning the box in 2007, Minneapolis, which alone seems to have collected data on the ban’s effect, found that fewer job applicants were rejected because of a criminal conviction. It also found that 57 percent of those deemed a “concern” were hired nonetheless. What’s more, considering criminal history only at the point of a job offer reduced staff time spent on screening prospective employees.


Other jurisdictions would be wise to adopt the reform in their hiring practices, as would companies, voluntarily. (Disclosure: Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News, asks job applicants about convictions within the previous seven years that haven’t been cleared from the record and states that such a history won’t necessarily disqualify the candidate.)
Avoiding Troublemakers

Many employers use a criminal record, even if an arrest did not result in a conviction, as a blunt way to avoid hiring troublemakers. But since about 30 percent of American adults have a record, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the measure is too crude. Employers are denying themselves the possibility of finding candidates who just might be right for the job at hand.


Private employers are also forgoing benefits. An employer who hires an ex-offender can claim a federal Work Opportunity Tax Credit of as much as $2,400. And under the Labor Department’s Federal Bonding Program, the employer is entitled to free, zero-deductible insurance to protect against losses resulting from any dishonest acts by such an employee.


Improving the job prospects of those with a criminal past benefits society as well. The odds of an ex-offender returning to crime are greatly reduced if he or she has a job. Banning the box isn’t going to solve a stubborn problem but, as the Minneapolis experience shows, it’s a start.


百分之50的回帖奖励,奖励10论坛币哦,有100个名额,大家积极参与讨论~~~不过还是希望保证好回帖质量~


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:follow LOW Applications unemployment Differential

已有 9 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
钟过 + 5 + 5 + 5 补偿
星野 + 3 + 3 + 3 你们是最棒的,加油!
dabin190 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
llg79 + 5 + 5 + 5 精彩帖子
happylife87 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
cglee + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
bengdi1986 + 100 + 2 + 2 + 5 精彩帖子
骆驼祥子 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
maiwenzhen + 1 + 1 + 1 interesting

总评分: 论坛币 + 100  学术水平 + 20  热心指数 + 20  信用等级 + 23   查看全部评分

沙发
shinysky01 发表于 2011-8-29 00:40:52 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
抢到了沙发!!!

使用道具

藤椅
shinysky01 发表于 2011-8-29 00:41:24 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
呃......没有论坛币

使用道具

板凳
夸克之一 发表于 2011-8-29 01:12:47 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

回帖奖励 +10

that's a hot topic among labor economists.

使用道具

报纸
zifeng2008 在职认证  学生认证  发表于 2011-8-29 01:21:20 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

回帖奖励 +10

第一次来看这个

使用道具

地板
denver 发表于 2011-8-29 02:05:16 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

回帖奖励 +10

不知道亚裔的就业情况怎么样,我比较关心这个
Denver大家一起读Paper系列索引贴:
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1430892-1-1.html

使用道具

7
lucy430022 发表于 2011-8-29 04:43:43 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

回帖奖励 +10

It sounds not bad. But for some sensitive positions, it may be scary.
One thing for sure, nobody would like the idea to have someone with criminal record to be their kids' teacher even the person can do his/her job perfectly.
已有 1 人评分经验 学术水平 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 60 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 60  学术水平 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

8
maiwenzhen 发表于 2011-8-29 05:21:48 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
It gives a good question: is it fair to judge a person by his past criminal record.
This passage also states that white gets the job because they are less likely to commit a crime. Obviously, it is not the only reason.

使用道具

9
phinjoy123 发表于 2011-8-29 07:11:05 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
我是来碰运气的,啊哈哈

使用道具

10
phinjoy123 发表于 2011-8-29 07:11:18 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

回帖奖励 +10

运气貌似不怎么的

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-11-14 14:43