楼主: bengdi1986
4179 36

[财经英语角区] 20111220 Follow Me 224 Will China Break? [推广有奖]

学科带头人

98%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
2
论坛币
1849 个
通用积分
12.2147
学术水平
977 点
热心指数
1138 点
信用等级
961 点
经验
56615 点
帖子
2014
精华
7
在线时间
1303 小时
注册时间
2009-5-2
最后登录
2020-3-10

初级热心勋章 中级热心勋章 初级学术勋章 高级热心勋章 初级信用勋章 中级学术勋章 高级学术勋章 中级信用勋章

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

Will China Break?

By PAUL KRUGMAN

Published: December 18, 2011


Consider the following picture: Recent growth has relied on a huge construction boom fueled by surging real estate prices, and exhibiting all the classic signs of a bubble. There was rapid growth in credit — with much of that growth taking place not through traditional banking but rather through unregulated “shadow banking” neither subject to government supervision nor backed by government guarantees. Now the bubble is bursting — and there are real reasons to fear financial and economic crisis.


Am I describing Japan at the end of the 1980s? Or am I describing America in 2007? I could be. But right now I’m talking about China, which is emerging as another danger spot in a world economy that really, really doesn’t need this right now.


I’ve been reluctant to weigh in on the Chinese situation, in part because it’s so hard to know what’s really happening. All economic statistics are best seen as a peculiarly boring form of science fiction, but China’s numbers are more fictional than most. I’d turn to real China experts for guidance, but no two experts seem to be telling the same story.


Still, even the official data are troubling — and recent news is sufficiently dramatic to ring alarm bells.


The most striking thing about the Chinese economy over the past decade was the way household consumption, although rising, lagged behind overall growth. At this point consumer spending is only about 35 percent of G.D.P., about half the level in the United States.


So who’s buying the goods and services China produces? Part of the answer is, well, we are: as the consumer share of the economy declined, China increasingly relied on trade surpluses to keep manufacturing afloat. But the bigger story from China’s point of view is investment spending, which has soared to almost half of G.D.P.


The obvious question is, with consumer demand relatively weak, what motivated all that investment? And the answer, to an important extent, is that it depended on an ever-inflating real estate bubble. Real estate investment has roughly doubled as a share of G.D.P. since 2000, accounting directly for more than half of the overall rise in investment. And surely much of the rest of the increase was from firms expanding to sell to the burgeoning construction industry.


Do we actually know that real estate was a bubble? It exhibited all the signs: not just rising prices, but also the kind of speculative fever all too familiar from our own experiences just a few years back — think coastal Florida.


And there was another parallel with U.S. experience: as credit boomed, much of it came not from banks but from an unsupervised, unprotected shadow banking system. There were huge differences in detail: shadow banking American style tended to involve prestigious Wall Street firms and complex financial instruments, while the Chinese version tends to run through underground banks and even pawnshops. Yet the consequences were similar: in China as in America a few years ago, the financial system may be much more vulnerable than data on conventional banking reveal.


Now the bubble is visibly bursting. How much damage will it do to the Chinese economy — and the world?


Some commentators say not to worry, that China has strong, smart leaders who will do whatever is necessary to cope with a downturn. Implied though not often stated is the thought that China can do what it takes because it doesn’t have to worry about democratic niceties.


To me, however, these sound like famous last words. After all, I remember very well getting similar assurances about Japan in the 1980s, where the brilliant bureaucrats at the Ministry of Finance supposedly had everything under control. And later, there were assurances that America would never, ever, repeat the mistakes that led to Japan’s lost decade — when we are, in reality, doing even worse than Japan did.


For what it’s worth, statements about economic policy from Chinese officials don’t strike me as being especially clear-headed. In particular, the way China has been lashing out at foreigners — among other things, imposing a punitive tariff on imports of U.S.-made autos that will do nothing to help its economy but will help poison trade relations — does not sound like a mature government that knows what it’s doing.


And anecdotal evidence suggests that while China’s government may not be constrained by rule of law, it is constrained by pervasive corruption, which means that what actually happens at the local level may bear little resemblance to what is ordered in Beijing.


I hope that I’m being needlessly alarmist here. But it’s impossible not to be worried: China’s story just sounds too much like the crack-ups we’ve already seen elsewhere. And a world economy already suffering from the mess in Europe really, really doesn’t need a new epicenter of crisis.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:follow break China HINA will 2011 opinion another really China

回帖推荐

一刃青霜 发表于25楼  查看完整内容

The article today is extremely splendid and so do all of the replies and discuss.I do agree the view that "we are developing,we are on the way to well developed." That means we chinese are young and do have a long way to go ,we have full chance to try mistakes and time to fix them . And the more presure we load, the smarter and harder try we will make, which is excatly proved by 5000 years' histo ...

gaper808 发表于22楼  查看完整内容

I wander what would happen if a economy crisis happened in China.What would happen when the bubble bursted? A rather worrying question. The real estate bubble should be responsible for the high CPI .The rich people has the biggest amount of money ,and they need only very little to consume ,most of their wealth is in the form of investment ,especialy the real estate.And the major crowd of consumpt ...

yongjianlin 发表于18楼  查看完整内容

Without wonder China need to be alarmed. I total agree with the 1st floor,there is no relationship between the tariff and the cracke-up. And anecdotal evidence suggests that while China’s government may not be constrained by rule of law, it is constrained by pervasive corruption, which means that what actually happens at the local level may bear little resemblance to what is ordered in Beijing. ...

whachel1976 发表于16楼  查看完整内容

These days, I'm also thinking about this problem. I conclude it as the difference between the socialism and capitalism. In a socialist country, economic system is mainly based on planned economy, while capitalist system is market-oriented. Although we say we are establishing a socialist market economy, it is affected impressively by the planned economy. That is, we have a goal, and we need to reac ...

Huanling123 发表于15楼  查看完整内容

(1)All economic statistics are best seen as a peculiarly boring form of science fiction, but China’s numbers are more fictional than most. --Our government should improve the accuracy of the data, but the most urgent should be making a strict, fixed standard. I just can't stand the China statistical data!!! (2)And anecdotal evidence suggests that while China’s government may not be constrained ...

reitty 发表于11楼  查看完整内容

After reading this artical,what come to my mind at the first time is that we need to be alarmed,yet do not be panic.This is China,not Japan,not America,not Europe. It is not wise to neglect or ignore the problems existing in today's China,such as the rising prices of real estate,the relative low percentage of consumer comsuption in GDP while investment's high percentage in GDP.China is a develo ...
已有 10 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
caihongchn + 3 + 3 + 3 来晚了,帖子不错!
cglee + 2 + 2 + 2 精彩帖子
dangxiao123 + 100 + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子
starskyjing + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
qiushenglx + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
whachel1976 + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子
榄外人L + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
happylife87 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
星野 + 3 + 3 + 3 对论坛有贡献
eros_zz + 100 对论坛有贡献

总评分: 经验 + 200  论坛币 + 80  学术水平 + 20  热心指数 + 21  信用等级 + 20   查看全部评分

沙发
bjmayi 发表于 2011-12-20 10:32:31 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
看来, 再大的经济学家也不能免俗. 中国的金融问题确实很严重. 需要提访. 但把中国的金融问题和对进口汽车的惩罚性关税扯起来, 就未免失去了经济学家的理性和严谨. 未免有些可笑!   难道不征那个关税, 中国的金融问题就会少一些?  唉.....   
已有 3 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
eros_zz + 22 鼓励积极发帖讨论
桉树熊 + 80 + 20 + 3 + 3 观点有启发
bengdi1986 + 20 + 2 + 2 + 2 呵呵,你看的真细致!观点有启发!

总评分: 经验 + 80  论坛币 + 62  学术水平 + 5  热心指数 + 5  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

使用道具

藤椅
lone_king 发表于 2011-12-20 11:11:29 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
还是应该正视我们经济可能面临的风险
已有 1 人评分经验 收起 理由
桉树熊 + 20 分析的有道理

总评分: 经验 + 20   查看全部评分

使用道具

板凳
happylife87 发表于 2011-12-20 12:07:28 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
It is in some way right that the housing bubble should not burst quickly, and stability seems necessary for the time being. But further growth should be limited!
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 20 + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 20  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

报纸
aituo 发表于 2011-12-20 12:18:49 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
中国的金融问题很严重
需要学习

使用道具

地板
GOONTOTHEBEST 发表于 2011-12-20 12:51:20 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
我想看Krugman的证据,而不是评论

使用道具

7
pengbin169 发表于 2011-12-20 13:17:17 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Unfortunately,the  crack-up  will replay in china,sooner or later.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 10 + 1 + 1 + 1 are you asure?

总评分: 论坛币 + 10  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

哪怕再不起眼的事情,你坚持几个月、几年、几十年,就可以创造奇迹!!!

使用道具

8
eaglestar 在职认证  发表于 2011-12-20 13:26:05 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Well, one thing is for sure that we chinese do not like to spend the future money. Compared with spending, we are more inclined to save for our future generations. We do admit our problems, but not that big.
已有 3 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
eros_zz + 40 + 20 鼓励积极发帖讨论
桉树熊 + 60 + 20 + 3 + 3 分析的有道理
bengdi1986 + 20 + 1 + 1 + 1 我很赞同

总评分: 经验 + 100  论坛币 + 60  学术水平 + 4  热心指数 + 4  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

一枚在书海漂流的叶子

使用道具

9
桉树熊 在职认证  发表于 2011-12-20 14:17:29 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
pengbin169 发表于 2011-12-20 13:17
Unfortunately,the  crack-up  will replay in china,sooner or later.
我觉得,由于银行的风险管理做得不好,所以才导致了贷款范围,贷款数额的限制,使得居民日常的小额贷款难以实现,以致我们的边际储蓄倾向越来越高。
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 20 + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 20  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

10
lzguo568 在职认证  发表于 2011-12-20 14:39:56 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
China, which is emerging as another danger spot in a world economy that really, really doesn’t need this right now. i am agree.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 20 + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 20  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

<img src="static/image/smiley/comcom/5.gif" class="vm&qu

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-9-20 12:28