楼主: 程氏
3992 9

[求助]问一道题 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

学前班

80%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
46 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
76 点
帖子
5
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2007-5-25
最后登录
2007-5-29

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

A公司目前的资本金完全由股本构成,权益价值为4000万元.股权成本为15%,不存在税收.A公司计划发行1000万元的债券用于回购股票,债务成本为10%.请计算回购股票后的权益成本是多少?并对计算结果进行解释.如果公司所得税20%,那又如何

请达人解达,虽然原理我懂,但一碰上计算我就有点晕

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:公司所得税 权益成本 债务成本 资本金 是多少 求助

沙发
guoqingchun 发表于 2007-5-25 13:38:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

回购后的权益成本是550万元,因为回购后的权益金额为3000万元,债券是1000万元,两者的成本相加即得。如果税率是20%的话,债券是税后分红,所以总权益成本是561万元。

使用道具

藤椅
程氏 发表于 2007-5-25 21:34:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

好象不是这样算的感觉

因为它要求计算的不是整个资金成本,且根据MM理论,如考虑税盾效应,则回购股票后资金成本应该下降~~恩 达人加油哦~~呵呵

谢谢大家了

使用道具

板凳
warecucff 发表于 2007-5-26 10:01:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

MM Propositions

The theorem is made up of two propositions which can also be extended to a situation with taxes.

Consider two firms which are identical except for their financial structures. The first (Firm U) is unlevered: that is, it is financed by equity only. The other (Firm L) is levered: it is financed partly by equity, and partly by debt. The Modigliani-Miller theorem states that the value of the two firms is the same.

Without taxes

Proposition I: where VU is the value of an unlevered firm = price of buying a firm composed only of equity, and VL is the value of a levered firm = price of buying a firm that is composed of some mix of debt and equity.

To see why this should be true, suppose an investor is considering buying one of the two firms U or L. Instead of purchasing the shares of the levered firm L, he could purchase the shares of firm U and borrow the same amount of money B that firm L does. The eventual returns to either of these investments would be the same. Therefore the price of L must be the same as the price of U minus the money borrowed B, which is the value of L's debt.

This discussion also clarifies the role of some of the theorem's assumptions. We have implicitly assumed that the investor's cost of borrowing money is the same as that of the firm, which need not be true in the presence of asymmetric information or in the absence of efficient markets.

Proposition II:

  • rS is the cost of equity.
  • r0 is the cost of capital for an all equity firm.
  • rB is the cost of debt.
  • B / S is the debt-to-equity ratio.

This proposition states that the cost of equity is a linear function of the firm's debt to equity ratio. A higher debt-to-equity ratio leads to a higher required return on equity, because of the higher risk involved for equity-holders in a company with debt. The formula is derived from the theory of weighted average cost of capital.

These propositions are true assuming the following assumptions:

  • no taxes exist,
  • no transaction costs exist, and
  • individuals and corporations borrow at the same rates.

These results might seem irrelevant (after all, none of the conditions are met in the real world), but the theorem is still taught and studied because it tells us something very important. That is, if capital structure matters, it is precisely because one or more of the assumptions is violated. It tells us where to look for determinants of optimal capital structure and how those factors might affect optimal capital structure.

With taxes

Proposition I:

  • VL is the value of a levered firm.
  • VU is the value of an unlevered firm.
  • TCB is the tax rate (TC) x the value of debt (B)

This means that there are advantages for firms to be levered, since corporations can deduct interest payments. Therefore leverage lowers tax payments. Dividend payments are non-deductible.

Proposition II:

  • rS is the cost of equity.
  • r0 is the cost of capital for an all equity firm.
  • rB is the cost of debt.
  • B / S is the debt-to-equity ratio.
  • Tc is the tax rate.

The same relationship as earlier described stating that the cost of equity rises with leverage, because the risk to equity rises, still holds. The formula however has implications for the difference with the WACC.

The following assumptions are made in the propositions with taxes:

  • corporations are taxed at the rate TC on earnings after interest,
  • no transaction cost exist, and
  • individuals and corporations borrow at the same rate

使用道具

报纸
程氏 发表于 2007-5-26 22:25:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

谢谢WARECUCFF的解答,我所看到的MM理论从来都是只有最基本的结论,现在的我感觉自己以前的理解上有误区,请问WARECUCFF,一个公司价值是如何衡量呢,不是从WACC来考虑吗?还有能把这道题怎么做告诉我吗,呵呵,这样我觉得好理解点,谢谢!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

使用道具

地板
程氏 发表于 2007-5-26 22:25:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

谢谢WARECUCFF的解答,我所看到的MM理论从来都是只有最基本的结论,现在的我感觉自己以前的理解上有误区,请问WARECUCFF,一个公司价值是如何衡量呢,不是从WACC来考虑吗?还有能把这道题怎么做告诉我吗,呵呵,这样我觉得好理解点,谢谢!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

使用道具

7
warecucff 发表于 2007-5-26 23:29:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

case[1] without tax: equity value(S)=4000, cost of capital for all equity firm(R0)=15%, new debt level(B)=1000, cost of debt=10%, debt,equity ratio(B/S)=1/3,after share repurchaing cost of equity(Rs)=R0+(R0-Rb)*B/S=0.167

case[2] with tax:Rs=R0+(R0-Rb)*(1-Tc)*B/S=0.153

Equity value is a market-based measure of the equity value of a firm. It accounts for all the ownership interest in a firm including the value of unexercised stock options and securities convertible to equity. Equity value differs from market capitalization in that it incorporates all equity interests in a firm whereas market capitalization only reflects those common shares currently outstanding.

The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is used in finance to measure a firm's cost of capital. This has been used by many firms in the past as a discount rate for financed projects, as the cost of financing (capital) is regarded by some as a logical discount rate (required rate of return) to use. Weighted Average Cost of Capital is the return a firm must earn on existing assets to keep its stock price constant and satisfy its creditors and owners.


Corporations raise money from two main sources: equity and debt. Thus the capital structure of a firm comprises three main components: preferred equity, common equity and debt (typically bonds and notes). The WACC takes into account the relative weights of each component of the capital structure and presents the expected cost of new capital for a firm.

The weighted average cost of capital is defined by:

where


and the following table defines each symbol:


Symbol Meaning Units
weighted average cost of capital %
required or expected rate of return on equity, or cost of equity %
required or expected rate of return on borrowings, or cost of debt %
corporate tax rate %
total debt and leases currency
total equity and equity equivalents currency
total capital invested in the going concern currency


This equation describes only the situation with homogeneous equity and debt. If part of the capital consists, for example, of preferred stock (with different cost of equity y), then the formula would include an additional term for each additional source of capital.

Since we are measuring expected cost of new capital, we should use the market values of the components, rather than their book values (which can be significantly different). In addition, other, more "exotic" sources of financing, such as convertible/callable bonds, convertible preferred stock, etc., would normally be included in the formula if they exist in any significant amounts - since the cost of those financing methods is usually different from the plain vanilla bonds and equity due to their extra features.

How do we find out the values of the components in the formula for WACC? First let us note that the "weight" of a source of financing is simply the market value of that piece divided by the sum of the values of all the pieces. For example, the weight of common equity in the above formula would be determined as follows:

Market value of common equity / (Market value of common equity + Market value of debt + Market value of preferred equity)

So, let us proceed in finding the market values of each source of financing (namely the debt, preferred stock, and common stock).

  • The market value for equity for a publicly traded company is simply the price per share multiplied by the number of shares outstanding, and tends to be the easiest component to find.
  • The market value of the debt is easily found if the company has publicly traded bonds. Frequently, companies also have a significant amount of bank loans, whose market value is not easily found. However, since the market value of debt tends to be pretty close to the book value (for companies that have not experienced significant changes in credit rating, at least), the book value of debt is usually used in the WACC formula.
  • The market value of preferred stock is again usually easily found on the market, and determined by multiplying the cost per share by number of shares outstanding.

Now, let us take care of the costs.

  • Preferred equity is equivalent to a perpetuity, where the holder is entitled to fixed payments forever. Thus the cost is determined by dividing the periodic payment by the price of the preferred stock, in percentage terms.
  • The cost of debt is the yield to maturity on the publicly traded bonds of the company. Failing availability of that, the rates of interest charged by the banks on recent loans to the company would also serve as a good cost of debt. Since a corporation normally can write off taxes on the interest it pays on the debt, however, the cost of debt is further reduced by the tax rate that the corporation is subject to. Thus, the cost of debt for a company becomes (YTM on bonds or interest on loans) × (1 − tax rate). In fact, the tax deduction is usually kept in the formula for WACC, rather than being rolled up into cost of debt, as such:
WACC = weight of preferred equity × cost of preferred equity
+ weight of common equity × cost of common equity
+ weight of debt × cost of debt × (1 − tax rate)

And now we are ready to plug all our data into the WACC formula.

The economists Merton Miller and Franco Modigliani showed in the Modigliani-Miller theorem that in a perfect economy without taxes, a firm's cost of capital (and thus the valuation) does not depend on the debt to equity ratio. However, many governments allow a tax deduction on interest and thus in such an environment, there is a bias towards debt financing.

使用道具

8
aicr123321 发表于 2007-5-27 00:42:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
???

使用道具

9
sam471 发表于 2007-6-1 21:50:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

A公司目前的资本金完全由股本构成,权益价值为4000万元.股权成本为15%,不存在税收.A公司计划发行1000万元的债券用于回购股票,债务成本为10%.请计算回购股票后的权益成本是多少?并对计算结果进行解释.如果公司所得税20%,那又如何

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

答:应用以下公式

iWACC = {[B/(B+S)]*iB*(1- TC)} + {[S/(B+S)]*iS}

B = the market value of corporate bonds

S = the market value of corporate stock

iB = required return on corporate bonds

iS = required return on corporate stock

TC = marginal corporate tax rate

回购之后,股本价值为3000,债务价值为1000,不考虑税率有

iwacc=(1000/4000)*10%+(3000/4000)*15%=13.75%

即权益成本为13.75%,由于成本为10%债务的引进,使原有为15%的权益成本(股本成本)下降。

考虑税率有,

iwacc=(1000/4000)*(1-20%)*10%+(3000/4000)*15%=13.25%

由于所得税的影响,应付的债务利息(即债务成本)抵减了主营业务收入从而使应纳税收入和应纳税款减少,也就降低了债务成本,而股本成本不变,总的权益成本得到进一步减少。

msn:luotuoxiangzi.student@sina.com QQ:176937451

使用道具

10
sam471 发表于 2007-6-1 21:56:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

case[1] without tax: equity value(S)=4000, cost of capital for all equity firm(R0)=15%, new debt level(B)=1000, cost of debt=10%, debt,equity ratio(B/S)=1/3,after share repurchaing cost of equity(Rs)=R0+(R0-Rb)*B/S=0.167

case[2] with tax:Rs=R0+(R0-Rb)*(1-Tc)*B/S=0.153

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

不好意思,你做错了,equity ratio(B/S)=1/3,应该是1/4

msn:luotuoxiangzi.student@sina.com QQ:176937451

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-12 11:19