文献研读1（22）:The political economy of manufacturing growth and decline acros

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

第一个主题：经济增长
第22篇文献：Grant II DonSherman, and Wallace Michael. The political economy of manufacturing growth anddecline across the American States, 1970–1985. Social Forces, 1994, 73(1),33-63.


推荐大家读前7页。三个看点：
1.美国制造业迁移的过程：1970s国内迁移，1980s向国外迁移。
2.美国地方ZF对制造业转移进行干预的效果，类似中国的情况。
3.空间再布局是推动经济发展进入下一个长波的重要战略。

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖

关键词：Political Economy Decline politic Growth political Michael growth across 主题

什么都能赚Q流量哈，赞

美国制造业迁移历史：1970s-1980s
There has been an unprecedented redistribution of manufacturing employment from the Rust Belt states of the Northeast and Midwest to the Sun Belt states of the South and West, particularly in the 1970s (Crandall, 1993). This occurred as domestic manufacturers responded to their foreign competitors by relocating to states offering cheaper labor and better resources.
Manufacturers confronted with stiff foreign competition responded by moving their production facilities to offshores sites to take advantage of cheaper labor, lower taxes, and more lax environmental enforcement, leaving in their wake empty factories and devastated communities. This trend accelerated particularly in the 1980s.


美国ZF实施地吸引产业的政策及其效果
The effectiveness of new economic development programs (EDPs) in fostering real economic growth has been a source of controversy among economists and policy analysts.
正：Proponents of EDPs argue that their long-term benefits, while difficult to measure, are critical to economic revitalization and outweigh the short-term costs required to attract new business. They point to high-profile success stories such as the Honda plant in Marysville, Ohio or Nissan in Smyrna, Tennessee and their purported multiplier effects for other local business as evidence for the positive benefits of EDPs for priming local economies.
反：Others, however, suggest that EDPs do not yield sufficient long-term growth to justify the billions of dollars in giveaways that are granted to business (Harrison and Kanter, 1978). Critics contend that EDPs are often imprudently conceived, work at cross-purposes with each other, or simply reshuffle the state’s economic winners and losers while producing no net economic growth (Glaser and Yeager, 1990). Both sides agree that overall effectiveness of EDPs may diminish as local states mimic each, providing essentially the same package of economic development strategies (Eisinger, 1988).

空间的意义
空间化的2个前提 the increased fragmentation of work tasks into simpler components and a higher integrated division of labor; advanced transportation and telecommunication technologies.
Jafffee (1986) discussion of the “spatial-geographic restructuring of capital” comes closest to our own view by arguing that heightened capital mobility is a capitalist response to falling profits and crises of accumulation that beset the U.S. economy in the 1970s.
Spatialization might constitute the foundation for the next long wave of capitalist accumulation.