楼主: bigfoot0517
1780 1

[外行报告] 花旗--中国基建行业研究报告2008年6月 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 21粉丝

已卖:14110份资源

学术权威

21%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
6
论坛币
12493638 个
通用积分
3.1784
学术水平
391 点
热心指数
369 点
信用等级
405 点
经验
28609 点
帖子
2147
精华
2
在线时间
242 小时
注册时间
2006-11-15
最后登录
2019-1-31

楼主
bigfoot0517 发表于 2008-6-23 23:49:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

China Infrastructure Construction
Focus on Growth of Core Business; Buy CRCC and CCC; Hold CRGL
 Initiating on 2 big-cap infrastructure construction companies — We are positive
about the outlook for railway investment in 08E-10E. In terms of stock picks,
we prefer companies that have large exposure to the railway construction
market, visible construction business revenue growth, high operating leverage,
and evident margin improvement. Our top pick is CRCC (1186.HK). We initiate
on CCC (1800.HK) at Buy/Low Risk and CRGL (390.HK) at Hold/Medium Risk.
 Our top pick is CRCC — 1) Duopoly position in the railway construction
industry; 2) Visible top line growth of 20% CAGR in 07-09E; 3) High operating
leverage (08E) of 4X on construction; 4) EBIT margin improvement from 2.5%
in 07 to 3% in 09E; and 5) strong int’l revenue CAGR of 110% in 07-09E.
 Buy CCC — We like CCC’s diversification, operating environment and
management team. We forecast 41% pre-excep. earnings CAGR in 07-09E,
mainly driven by product mix upgrade (from road to railway, int’l and BOT
projects). Our margin improvement expectation is less than the Street's and
management's estimates as we believe margins will likely to be suppressed in
its machinery and dredging businesses. However, we think the stock offers
value post recent share price pullback (~19% upside to our target price).
 Hold CRGL — While we recognize its similarities to CRCC, we think CRGL is
less attractive than CRCC for the following: 1) Non-core business (property and
mining) which accounts for 25% of total EBIT in 09E should deserve much
lower multiples than the core business; 2) Lack of margin improvement track
record and heavy historical burden; 3) Less international market exposure; and
4) Less cash than CRCC (14% net cash/equity vs. CRCC’s 70% in 09E). Our
12-month SOTP-based TP of HK$7.1 implies only 13% upside.
 Potential catalysts — 1) Announcement of any large construction project wins;
and 2) Positive earnings announcement and margin improvements.
 Valuation — We use DCF to value the construction and ancillary businesses
(i.e. design, manufacturing, dredging), and P/E for non-core businesses. We
think fast earnings growth can justify the high valuation for this sector.
 Risk — Raw material overrun and heavy reliance on gov’t planning/spending.
Upside exists in unexpected upward adjustment in railway construction
reference prices and railway investment and better-than-expected margins.

目录

Industry View 5
CRCC and CRGL are the key railway builders 5
CRCC and CCC have more visible revenue growth in the
construction business 6
CRCC and CRGL have high operating leverage, but CRCC is in a
better position to capture the opportunity 7
Valuation 10
Risks 16
Raw materials cost volatility 16
Heavy reliance on government planning/spending 16
Risks in foreign business 16
Foreign exchange risks 17
Lack of diversification – a long-term risk 17
China Communications Construction (1800.HK) 18
China Railway Group (0390.HK) 42
Appendix: Transportation Infrastructure Investment
Estimate 63
Appendix A-1 65

222124.pdf (637.29 KB, 需要: 5 个论坛币)


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:行业研究报告 研究报告 行业研究 Construction announcement 研究报告 行业 花旗 基建

沙发
fuguitop(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2008-6-24 02:45:00

已验证

没有问题

会员放心购买

谢谢bigfoot的分享

对用户:bigfoot0517近日所发行业分析报告汇总奖励金币5,金钱50,经验50,魅力50

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-26 02:38