楼主: bigfoot0518
1706 0

[外行报告] 瑞士信贷:美国新能源行业研究报告2009年1月 [推广有奖]

已卖:2563份资源

学术权威

70%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
10
论坛币
10441579 个
通用积分
7.0590
学术水平
1222 点
热心指数
923 点
信用等级
1220 点
经验
65985 点
帖子
2052
精华
21
在线时间
405 小时
注册时间
2008-12-11
最后登录
2021-8-16

楼主
bigfoot0518 发表于 2009-2-4 09:13:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Alternative Energy
SECTOR REVIEW
How Much Does It Cost?

How do the costs of alternative energy technologies compare? We
find that solar crystalline is the most expensive at $153 while solar thermal is
$90 per MWh, both still significantly more expensive than traditional sources.
In comparison, nuclear power costs $62, coal is $55, and natural gas plants
are $52 per MWh. Wind and geothermal power are the least expensive
alternative energy sources at $43 and $36 per MWh, respectively. Our
interactive LCOE model is available upon request; please contact your
Credit Suisse representative for a copy.

“Grid parity” is a moving target. Grid parity is dependent on the price of
natural gas which generally sets the price at peak times. With NYMEX gas
at $5, this implies power prices in the range of $36 for efficient gas plants
(7,200 heat rate) to $70 for inefficient peaker plants (14,000 heat rate).

From a utility’s perspective, solar is far from grid parity without
subsidies. At a $6/watt system price, solar PV (crystalline) is approximately
$153 per MWh and $140 for thin film, including the investment tax credit
incentive. Without incentives, solar PV is $240 and wind is at $64 per MWh.

Regardless of the economics, we believe solar will continue to grow.
There is significant momentum behind the solar industry, but that growth is
being driven by policy directives and government incentives, not by
economics. Additionally, residential and commercial users can benefit from
roof-top solar systems, which are influenced by slightly different economics.

Cost reductions are key for solar. Longer term, solar has its place on the
grid, as it generates power at peak times and has zero carbon emissions.
However, to be an economic alternative for utilities, system prices need to
decline 50% (to $3/watt, including the balance of system components), and
a $20/ton carbon tax must be imposed on carbon-generating plants. We
think the oversupply in solar can drive prices to this level by 2010-11. Under
this scenario (no incentives, 50% cost reduction, and a $20 carbon tax),
solar PV LCOE is $141, which implies a gas price of at least $10 for it to be
economical.

Grid investments are project specific and can be significant. For
example, a $1 billion transmission investment for a 500-mile line would add
$20 per MWh to the LCOE. Distributed generation, such as rooftop solar PV,
fuel cell power plants and microturbines, have the benefit of requiring
minimal grid investments.

Table of contents
The Levelized Cost of Electricity 3
Apples to Apples in Alternative Energy 3
Our Conclusions 4
The LCOE methodology 5
Solar and utilities: speaking the same language 6
Dispatch curves favor solar power: low variable costs 7
“Peak Demand” generation also favors solar 7
A hypothetical exercise… 8
Solar growth will be driven by policy 9
“Grid Parity” is a moving target… 9
Solar PV Crystalline 10
Solar PV – Thin Film 12
Solar Thermal 14
Wind 16
Efficient Gas Plant (CCGT) 18
Nuclear 20
Coal 22
Fuel Cells 24
Geothermal 26
Appendix 28
Assumptions & Further Considerations 28
Why is the LCOE for gas plants (CCGT) lower than the actual dispatch cost? 29
Glossary of Terms 30

290458.pdf (513.14 KB, 需要: 500 个论坛币)


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:新能源行业研究报告 新能源行业研究 行业研究报告 新能源行业 瑞士信贷 美国 研究报告 新能源 信贷 瑞士

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-25 06:31