楼主: eros_zz
11571 93

[财经英语角区] 20110512 Follow Me 2 [推广有奖]

21
hanjianhua123 发表于 2011-5-12 12:56:05
2  2
The US also made some progress on opening up China’s financial system. The US argues that financial reform will make it easier for Chinese consumers to save and borrow, thus boosting domestic consumption in China.
美国也取得了一些进步开放中国的金融体系。美国认为,金融改革会使它更容易为中国消费者对储蓄和借贷,从而拉动国内消费在中国
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
eros_zz + 20 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

少时诵诗书

22
mydz 发表于 2011-5-12 13:08:03
强烈建议楼主在贴出英文文章的时候注明作者和出处

在文章的开头写一个小的英文简介  然后让读者选择是否继续阅读!
我就是一个上进的孩子~

23
arthuryu2010 发表于 2011-5-12 13:08:46
From my view, two super countries will corporate with each other more and more,because they are stakeholders. 2  2
PS:Today 's artical is more difficult than yesterday's.I even can't seize main ideas.
已有 1 人评分经验 收起 理由
eros_zz + 20 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 20   查看全部评分

24
happylife87 发表于 2011-5-12 13:09:58
2, 2

I think Intellectual Property is needed to be solved since it is good to China in the long run. But for ordinary citizens, we may have to pay for many kinds of softwares if policies are made by China.

For Chinese insurance companies, it may not be good news because car insurance is important to many companies, especially state-owned ones.

For tech exports to China, it is also a long way to go, but it can be seen as a good sign at least.

I expect interest rates competition for depositors, but regulations and reinsurance is a must.

One point to act, news in China said that US pledged to admit China's being a market economy country in the future.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
eros_zz + 20 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

25
仪朝 发表于 2011-5-12 13:12:00
I think it's too difficult for china to get access to sensitive US technology.also investing in America can inhence the interaction between this two country , But what we do there are some lack of sensitive technical field,that's what American don't want to do .so I think more benefit policy should be given before more chinese want to invest there .
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
eros_zz + 20 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

26
方浪 发表于 2011-5-12 13:33:17
1
I have just seen  this topic right now! As far as am concerned ,this is a very good idea ,I will suppot the host strongly!

ae we all know ,US is the largest and stongest country in the field of economy,now China is growing  up very quickly,especailly  its  economy,and it has overtakeed Japanese just last yeal!So the bunisesses between China and US  are good for each other,we need each other !we should work togher ,understang each other ,and help each other to solve all kinds of probiems!
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
eros_zz + 20 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

阳光总在风雨后!

27
andrew_chaung 发表于 2011-5-12 13:52:30
支持一下呗

28
桉树熊 在职认证  发表于 2011-5-12 14:11:54
2 2
I think the most urgent problem would be Inflation but not domestic demand, for different organization even haven't a consensus of the cause of inflation  now. NDRC insist that the Inflation is due to the bottleneck of the transportation and infrastructure while the PboC imply the inflation is caused by the surplus of liquidity. Chinese government should consider the inflation while encourage investing in US.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
eros_zz + 20 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

29
eaglestar 在职认证  发表于 2011-5-12 14:22:43
1,1
From the previous rounds of SED talks, it is indicated that the gap between the two is narrowing yet still is very large. This talk will improve the status of China a little bit, but it is till a long way to go before China holds more power and strength in international communities.
PS: I think this is a good step for readers, but in my view it is also necessary to name the source of the article, NYT, BBC, WSJ..., and some key terminologies must be identified. Hope this program will go better.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
eros_zz + 20 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

30
zcy29 发表于 2011-5-12 14:54:05
支持 看一看

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-7 01:14