楼主: bigfoot0517
1635 0

[外行报告] 摩根斯坦利:美国软件行业研究报告2009年9月 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 21粉丝

学术权威

21%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
6
论坛币
12493617 个
通用积分
2.6112
学术水平
391 点
热心指数
369 点
信用等级
405 点
经验
28609 点
帖子
2147
精华
2
在线时间
242 小时
注册时间
2006-11-15
最后登录
2019-1-31

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Conclusion: We are downgrading our software industry
view from Attractive to In-Line as we move into the
growth phase of the economic recovery and beyond the
early cycle phase that has driven our universe up 44%
vs. the NASDAQ +12% since Oct. ‘08. Software’s
outperformance has started to abate in recent months,
however, and there may be more relative upside from
here in mid-cycle groups like hardware. We move to
In-Line (rather than Cautious) as we still believe our
group holds some absolute upside, but stock picking will
become more important as detailed below.
Performance & Valuation Tracking Past Recoveries:
Large cap multiples have expanded by 35-40% from
trough, driving most of the performance – representing
about 70-80% of the expansion seen in prior recoveries.
Our group is now within 5% of its 5 yr. avg. PEG, with the
avg. PE only 20% below ‘07 levels. We may see more
multiple expansion, but the next phase of performance
should be driven primarily by growth and est. revisions.
Some Recovery Already in Consensus: NTM EPS
growth for software went modestly negative in CY09, but
troughed well above other sectors—suggesting less
potential for relative growth in a recovery. Further, cons.
already reflects an average 23% acceleration in lic. rev.
growth CY09/10 (above levels seen in 2003), 150 bps of
op. margin expansion in CY10 and incremental margins
of 45% in CY10 for our group, well above the 6 yr.
avg—suggesting less potential for positive revisions.
Growth, Upside & Valuation Drive Longs: The base
case is now cyclical recovery, so we favor names with a)
faster than cyclical rev. growth, b) upside potential, c) co.
specific catalysts, and d) attractive valuations. Co.’s that
screen well include MSFT, ADBE, ORCL, FIRE & RHT,
while N, INTU, ADSK & CTXS are less attractive, and
we move the latter two from EW to Underweight.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:行业研究报告 摩根斯坦利 研究报告 软件行业 摩根斯坦 美国 软件 研究报告 行业 摩根斯坦利

ms 美国软件 9.pdf

1.35 MB

需要: 60000 个论坛币  [购买]

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-27 12:30