楼主: ccpceo
3745 34

[财经英语角区] 20110708 Follow Me 59 ccpceo [推广有奖]

  • 3关注
  • 13粉丝

一阶导数大于零

学科带头人

51%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
1
论坛币
19139 个
通用积分
3.1599
学术水平
137 点
热心指数
227 点
信用等级
94 点
经验
236512 点
帖子
1805
精华
0
在线时间
1890 小时
注册时间
2009-10-30
最后登录
2021-5-31
毕业学校
顿涅茨克国立理工大学

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Why Corporate Governance is So Important to China

forbes:

Ask most what is the biggest economic risk facing China today and you will probably hear about food inflation, property prices, or growing imbalances between the rich and working class in society.

Those are all worthy challenges, which the Chinese government has been acutely focused on in the last year.  They just raised interest rates another quarter point this morning to deal with inflation.

However, there’s an area which has been getting much less attention, yet which could be more dangerous to China: problematic or lax corporate governance.

Corporate governance has to do with how organizations are run.  Organizations with proper corporate governance have accountability and transparency.  People in authority at those organizations know that their actions will be seen and judged by others.  Therefore, those leaders are more likely to act in ways that benefit the organization’s stakeholders.  They are also less inclined to act in ways that benefit themselves personally at the expense of the organization.

China has always been a country that celebrates hard work and success in business.  To succeed in China, the winning companies face enormous competition domestically to get to the top and stay there.  They are generally not able to be incompetent or corrupt and succeed in the long-term.

But there is a growing crisis in China involving bad corporate governance that needs to be addressed immediately in order to prevent a major economic crisis in the future.

Last year, there were several Chinese-based companies who had previously chosen to go public in the United States via a process called a reverse take-over (RTO), who were accused of fraud.  In the last month, two such companies — China Media Express (CCME) and China Agritech (CAGC), who both had market capitalizations over $500 million last year — were delisted from NASDAQ because they are assumed by that exchange to be somewhat fraudulent.

Although there are at least a dozen other similar small RTOs with clouds hanging over them and who might be delisted in the future, most in China have never heard of these companies.  Most Americans have generally thought these kinds of frauds are not prevalent among larger Chinese companies.

But recently, two larger Chinese companies, who went public in the United States via more traditional IPO methods and with the help of more prestigious investment bankers, have also been accused of fraud by short sellers.

Sky-Mobi (MOBI) went public last December and saw its shares immediately drop 25%.  The Hangzhou-based mobile applications provider went on to announce several partnerships with large portal companies in China and its stock price increased 400% very quickly.  But it was then accused of fraud by American short-seller Citron

Research a month ago and its stock price has taken a major hit (although it’s recovered in the last week).

More worrying are recent accusations against New York Stock Exchange-listed Longtop Financial (LFT).  This financial software company was taken public by no less than Goldman Sachs (GS) in 2007. It has a large roster of well-known American hedge funds as major investors and a multi-billion dollar market capitalization.

Short-sellers recently accused Longtop of inflating its margins by hiding operating costs.  The stock has been halted for weeks, pending clarifications from the company.  

If Longtop gets delisted like a much smaller RTO company (which seems very likely), it will send shockwaves through the American investor community.

In May, the National Audit Office of China published financial problems at 17 state-owned enterprises (SOEs).  The allegations included overstating earnings, understating asset values, forging invoices, and paying excessive executive bonuses.  Companies involved in the accusations include China Three Gorges Corp and China Unicom (CHU).

Finally, in recent weeks, there has been a major uproar in the United States involving Yahoo!’s (YHOO) investment in Alibaba Group.  Yahoo! claims that they were only recently notified by Alibaba Group that Alipay had been transferred to Jack Ma’s personal control last year to comply with requirements by the Chinese government.  

According to Yahoo!, neither they nor Softbank (Alibaba Group’s other major investor) were compensated for the loss of Alipay.

As Yahoo! investors had come to place a good deal of hope in the future growth of Taobao and Alipay as reasons to own Yahoo!, the abrupt news immediately caused the American internet company to lose 10% of its value.

Yahoo! claimed — even though Jerry Yang sits on the Alibaba Group board — that they had been deceived.  Alibaba Group denies this strongly.  The parties now say they are in discussions to settle the matter.

The bottom line is that American investors feel nervous about all these matters — and the recent decline of major Chinese Internet stocks like Sina (SINA) and Baidu (BIDU) this month have also spooked them.

There are increasingly voices within the United States cautioning investors against buying Chinese stocks because their financials and the rules of the game for doing in business cannot be trusted.

Most of my Chinese friends can spot over-sensitive American patriotism a mile away and realize that it usually doesn’t have much effect on Sino-American relations.  

However, these recent lapses in Chinese corporate governance are worth paying attention to.

There are too many “isolated incidents” to not conclude there is potentially a more concerning systemic problem to be addressed.

We hear the Chinese government often discussing how important “social harmony” is to the Chinese society.  That’s why a property bubble that makes basic home ownership for the working class is a problem.  That’s why food inflation is important.  Equally important though is corruption.  Poor corporate governance leads to corruption.  It must be rooted out where it exists.

The elites of business cannot be allowed to take advantage of the workers through paying themselves excessive bonuses or overstating the earnings.  If there continues to be evidence of more widespread fraud at large and well-known Chinese companies, there will eventually be a crisis of confidence in Chinese businesses.

Not only is there a risk of foreign investors not trusting Chinese companies if there is not sound corporate governance but all Chinese people.  They could also pull their capital out of the stock market.

If there are problems at large Chinese companies, they must be dealt with now.  Microblogging tools from Sina and Tencent should be used to identify where there are problems to be corrected.

CEOs of Chinese largest companies must also take steps to ensure their own financial statements are clean and push their peers to do the same.

Crises tend to come from places you are not on guard against.  Everyone has been so concerned about a property real estate bubble bursting over the last year but the steps to deal with it have worked.  There’s yet been a concerted effort to improve the quality of Chinese corporate governance but there should be.

Two months ago, if asked about fraud in China, I would have said it’s only in the domain of the small reverse take-over companies.  I can’t say that any more.

A small brush fire has now grown larger.  The problem can still be dealt with if it’s given appropriate attention.  However, I fear it is being ignored.
I worry one day we’ll wake up and find a lack of confidence in Chinese corporate governance will lead to a run on these companies’ stock inside and outside of China.  

Investors will judge investing in China is similar to investing in a country like Russia, where rules can change routinely and arbitrarily.

As we saw in 2008, when confidence goes, Chinese stocks’ values can decline by more than 90% – and relatively quickly.

It is not too late, but proper oversight is required from the board of directors of every organization.  I hope each of these Chinese boards’ have sufficiently strong-willed and knowledgeable directors who are willing to challenge their CEOs to ensure that everything is as it appears to be at these companies.




有兴趣的朋友可以复看本文中文版:改善公司治理对中国至关重要 http://t.cn/apdMYV
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:follow ccpceo CCP CEO PCE follow ccpceo

已有 10 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
mscontrol + 1 + 1 + 1 对论坛有贡献
lovezxx366 + 1 字体可以大一些,文章很不错!
心情晴朗 + 1 + 1 + 1 除了字体有点小,别的都好~
whachel1976 + 1 + 1 + 1 不错,字体大一点就好了。
dabin190 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
Huanling123 + 1 观点有启发
zhengwenyi + 1 + 1 + 1 - -真早。。。
eros_zz + 60 + 60 + 1 + 3 + 3 对论坛有贡献
bengdi1986 + 60 + 60 + 2 + 2 + 2 对论坛有贡献
elizabethtan + 1

总评分: 经验 + 120  论坛币 + 120  学术水平 + 9  热心指数 + 13  信用等级 + 10   查看全部评分

PMP+CPA http://weibo.com/i/fireworld365
沙发
elizabethtan 发表于 2011-7-8 01:25:16 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
支持!!支持!!
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 热心指数 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 60 + 12 + 2 鼓励积极发帖讨论,今天的同胞们都好早啊

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 12  热心指数 + 2   查看全部评分

使用道具

藤椅
nkygwang 发表于 2011-7-8 05:25:59 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
成绩很多,问题也不少:However, there’s an area which has been getting much less attention, yet which could be more dangerous to China: problematic or lax corporate governance.
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 60 + 24 + 1 + 2 王哥真积极!!奖励

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 24  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 2   查看全部评分

使用道具

板凳
bengdi1986 发表于 2011-7-8 06:06:48 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
欢迎大家积极为ccpceo评分哈!!

使用道具

报纸
bengdi1986 发表于 2011-7-8 06:40:25 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
The sentence "That’s why food inflation is important" that facinates me ,and reflects in my minds profoundly. Of course , the inflation is only a negeligible factor. We should take it seriously, surpervise the whole process. The food price is higher than ever before ,however, the gap between farmers and citizens is widen? With the development of logistic and specialization, higher food price leads farms to a dilemma. What's more ,people in city have more welfares! How to help farmers to go out of the situation?

使用道具

地板
2441414 在职认证  发表于 2011-7-8 07:29:59 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
我就想不明白为何国有企业都有党委书记的职务呢?
已有 1 人评分经验 学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 48 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 48  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

佛说:不可曰。

使用道具

7
zhang533744 发表于 2011-7-8 07:43:57 来自手机 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
RTO(Reverse  take-over)    反向收购上市,是公司上市的一种形式,也称买壳上市。指非上市公司收购一家上市公司,再由该上市公司反向收购非上市公司,使其成功上市。在美国,公司上市分为直接上市(IPO公开上市)和间接上市(反向收购或买壳上市)
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 36 + 12 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 36  论坛币 + 12   查看全部评分

使用道具

8
zhengwenyi 在职认证  发表于 2011-7-8 08:27:43 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
ZF说信心比黄金重要,我想说您还是给黄金我吧, 对你们信任都谈不上,哪来的信心。。。
已有 1 人评分经验 热心指数 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 60 + 3 真有才

总评分: 经验 + 60  热心指数 + 3   查看全部评分

被 酒 莫 惊 春 睡 重 ,赌 书 消 得 泼 茶 香

使用道具

9
cglee 发表于 2011-7-8 09:23:21 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
学习了。不过说实话,公司治理是个老问题了,而且当下似乎达不到和通胀、房价并列的地步,作者分析还欠缺一些深度,有些一叶障目。
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 60 + 24 观点有启发

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 24   查看全部评分

使用道具

从未想过这个问题,要思考
已有 1 人评分经验 热心指数 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 36 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 36  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-28 03:09