国外退稿信两封

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

向国外投稿几次，都是网上投稿，有些的是通过期刊的出版社查到投稿地址的，有的收到录用信和退稿信，这里展示两篇退稿信
The Editorial Board of the Journal of Public Economics follows a two-step procedure in reviewing manuscripts. Initially, one of the editors reviews each submission to see whether the paper's content is well suited to the Journal. Then, conditional on a favorable decision, the paper is sent to external referees for review.

When I received your submission, I carried out our first-stage review. Your paper offers a set of very interesting insights on the scope of public economics. While your findings are intriguing and innovative, unfortunately, the subject matter of your paper does not fit directly within the core focus of the Journal of Public Economics. Your paper would be a much better fit for the Journal of Economic History. It will have a greater chance of being read by other researchers who are likely to cite your paper if it appears in such an outlet.

In view of this concern, I have decided not to send your paper to a referee. Subjecting you to the long and uncertain lags associated with the refereeing process would unnecessarily delay the ultimate publication of your paper, since I suspect that your paper would ultimately be rejected on the issue of subject fit. I expect that your paper is likely to be accepted in a good field journal with a closer topic match, and recommend that you resubmit the paper immediately to such an outlet.

I wish you all the best in continuing your work in this very interesting area, and hope that the current editorial decision will not discourage you from submitting other papers to the Journal of Public Economics in the future. Thank you for considering the Journal of Public Economics as an outlet for your research.



write you in regards to manuscript # JEH-OA-11-Jan-0026 entitled "~~~~~~~~" which you submitted to the The Journal of Economic History.

Having read the paper, I must decline to send it to reviewers, it is a work in the history of economic thought rather than economic history. A glance at recent papers published in the Journal would persuade you that this is not the kind of research we publish.

I would, however, like to thank you for considering the Journal of Economic History as a publication outlet for your research, and I hope that the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.

Sincerely,
Prof. Jean-Laurent Rosenthal

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏4 回帖

关键词：Considering Manuscripts Publication interesting Researchers procedure received content Journal carried

看看，公共经济杂志推荐我到经济史投稿，结果回答还是一样，看来国外的委婉退稿的方法与中国有很大的不同。

lz很牛  都冲击这些牛刊  加油加油

你自己不知道自己写的文章是什么么。。

人家说得很清楚，你写的是经济思想史，人家的期刊发表的是经济史。

不能怪Journal of Public Economics的编辑，他已经很客气了。

从上述两份信的内容看，你写了制度经济学思想的文献回顾。。或者近似的东西

打酱油路过的~~

连referee的手里都到不了。
你的文章还很差。

夸克之一 发表于 2011-9-2 21:15
你自己不知道自己写的文章是什么么。。

人家说得很清楚，你写的是经济思想史，人家的期刊发表的是经济史 ...

你说的很对，我写的是经济学方法论的进展和评论，已经投了很好几个知名杂志都说主题不符，后来投了剑桥大学的经济与哲学，回信说三周内决定，但一直没有收到消息。经济史杂志是要先入会的，不入会不会审稿的，我入会花了几十美元，一年内有效。若是谁有稿件，我挂第二作者，参与修改，账号可以借用。

gdczlhd 发表于 2011-9-2 21:12
lz很牛  都冲击这些牛刊  加油加油

只是试试，不知道国外杂志的底细，第一次投稿很快就录用了，以为国外杂志很好投，后来才知道国外的杂志档次分的更开。

haitianxxing 发表于 2011-9-2 21:31
你说的很对，我写的是经济学方法论的进展和评论，已经投了很好几个知名杂志都说主题不符，后来投了剑桥大 ...

你以为那个期刊是国内刊物啊。。。

呵呵。

有水平被JEH录取的人绝对不会为了这点钱和你分享著作权的。。

haitianxxing 发表于 2011-9-2 21:33
只是试试，不知道国外杂志的底细，第一次投稿很快就录用了，以为国外杂志很好投，后来才知道国外的杂志档 ...

这种题材的稿子除非学界大牛，否则基本没有可能。