楼主: 匿名
2764 1

[行为经济学] 供应链(报童模型)中行为问题的重要研究-From Top Journal [推广有奖]

匿名网友
楼主
匿名网友  发表于 2014-11-12 15:32:35 |坛友微信交流群|倒序 |AI写论文
相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
行为因素在供应链或者其他框架下的作用和影响究竟是什么样子的?仁者见仁智者见智,是可以控制的偏误还是产生本质影响的内生因素?下面选取四篇水平较高的论文,供大家学习,希望能为大家提供一个认识行为的视角。
MS_2013_Nagarajan_Prospect Theory and the Newsvendor Problem.pdf (293.43 KB, 需要: 1 个论坛币)
MS_2008_Christoph_Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance:An Experiment.pdf (336.11 KB, 需要: 1 个论坛币)
M&SOM_2010_Mirko Kremer_Do Random Errors Explain Newsvendor Behavior.pdf (269.17 KB, 需要: 1 个论坛币)
M&SOM_2007_Xuanming Su_Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models.pdf (401.66 KB, 需要: 1 个论坛币)


MSOM(2008)Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models——by Xuanming Su
Many theoretical models adopt a normative approach and assume that decision makers are perfect optimizers.
In contrast, this paper takes a descriptive approach and considers bounded rationality, in the sense
that decision makers are prone to errors and biases. Our decision model builds on the quantal choice model:
While the best decision need not always be made, better decisions are made more often. We apply this framework
to the classic newsvendor model and characterize the ordering decisions made by a boundedly rational
decision maker. We identify systematic biases and offer insight into when overordering and underordering may
occur. We also investigate the impact of these biases on several other inventory settings that have traditionally
been studied using the newsvendor model as a building block, such as supply chain contracting, the bullwhip
effect, and inventory pooling. We find that incorporating decision noise and optimization error yields results
that are consistent with some anomalies highlighted by recent experimental findings.


MS(2008) Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance:An Experimental Study——by Christoph H. Loch
Supply chain contracting literature has traditionally focused on aligning incentives for economically rational
players. Recent work has hypothesized that social preferences, as distinct from economic incentives, may
influence behavior in supply chain transactions. Social preferences refer to intrinsic concerns for the other
party’s welfare, reciprocating a history of a positive relationship, and intrinsic desires for a higher relative payoff
compared with the other party’s when status is salient. This article provides experimental evidence that social
preferences systematically affect economic decision making in supply chain transactions. Specifically, supply
chain parties deviate from the predictions provided by self-interested profit-maximization models, such that
relationship preference promotes cooperation, individual performance, and high system efficiency, sustainable
over time; whereas status preference induces tough actions and reduces both system efficiency and individual
performance.


MSOM(2010) Do Random Errors Explain Newsvendor Behavior?——by Mirko Kremer

Previous experimental work showed that newsvendors tend to order closer to mean demand than prescribed
by the normative critical fractile solution. A recently proposed explanation for this mean ordering behavior
assumes that the decision maker commits random choice errors, and predicts the mean ordering pattern because
there is more room to err toward mean demand than away from it. Do newsvendors exhibit mean ordering
simply because they make random errors? We subject this hypothesis to anempirical test that rests onthe fact
that the random error explanation is insensitive to context. Our results strongly support the existence of contextsensitive decision strategies that rely directly on (biased) order-to-demand mappings, such as mean demand
anchoring, demand chasing, and inventory error minimization



MS(2013)Prospect Theory and the Newsvendor Problem——by Mahesh Nagarajan, Steven Shechter
The newsvendor problem is a fundamental decision problem in operations management. Various independent
experimental studies in laboratory settings have shown similar deviations from the theoretical optimal order
quantity. We clarify that Prospect Theory, a prevalent framework for decision making under uncertainty, cannot
explain the consistent empirical findings





二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:From 供应链 Top Rom fro Journal 供应链 模型

沙发
missyiya 发表于 2016-2-14 20:08:58 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-1 14:37